a201-11f-09-PopulationGeneticsModernSynthesis

A201-11f-09-Populati - Introduction to Biological Anthropology Notes 9 Population genetics and the modern synthesis of evolutionary theory

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Introduction to Biological Anthropology: Notes 9 Population genetics and the modern synthesis of evolutionary theory Copyright Bruce Owen 2011 - Recall from an earlier lecture that variation can come in two forms: - discontinuous variation refers to traits that come in separate, distinct variants - like red, pink, or white snapdragon flowers - one kind of discontinuous variation is dichotomous variation : either-or characteristics; they have only two possibilities, like green vs. yellow peas - continuous variation (or continuously variable traits ) refers to traits that have an unbroken range of variation, rather than distinct types - like height, beak depth in finches, etc. - there are many, many continuously variable traits that are interesting and important, probably a lot more than discrete or dichotomous traits - We have seen that: - Mendel’s model explains dichotomous variation, - like green vs. yellow peas - it also explains discontinuous variation with three or more options, although we did not work through the details - But what about all those continuously variable traits, like height or hair color? - Mendel’s model can explain continuously variable traits, too - The key idea: - dichotomous traits are controlled by just one pair of loci - like the pair of loci for pea seed color - but continuously variable traits are controlled by many pairs of loci - each of the many pairs of loci influences the trait somewhat - the principles are the same - the details are more complicated, because there are many more combinations of alleles to consider - traits that are controlled by multiple pairs of loci are called polygenic - this is very common, and what we will consider today - Example: Let’s use the beak depth measured on the finches studied by Peter and Rosemary Grant on Daphne Major in the Galapagos - Imagine that beak depth is controlled by one pair of loci with codominant alleles - we could do this example imagining simple dominant and recessive alleles, too, but it would get slightly more complicated - say the alleles control the amount of a beak-stimulating hormone - H+ (more hormone), contributes to deeper beaks - H- (less hormone), contributes to shallower beaks - so the possible genotypes are - H+H+ (deep beak) - H+H- (intermediate beak)
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Intro to Biological Anthro F 2011 / Owen: Population genetics, modern synthesis p. 2 - there are two ways to get this (H+H-, or H-H+), so there are twice as many of these - H-H- (shallow beak) - This only gives three kinds of beaks, not a continuous distribution - it works just like any other codominant Mendelian trait - but now, imagine that alleles at another pair of loci also affect beak depth - say, by controlling the amount of calcium available for beak formation - C+ leads to more available calcium, hence deeper beaks - C- leads to less available calcium, hence smaller beaks - so now the genotypes are - H+H+C+C+: biggest beak - H+H+C+C-: slightly smaller - H+H+C-C-: slightly smaller yet
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 03/02/2012 for the course ANTHRO 201.3 taught by Professor Owen during the Fall '11 term at Sonoma.

Page1 / 11

A201-11f-09-Populati - Introduction to Biological Anthropology Notes 9 Population genetics and the modern synthesis of evolutionary theory

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online