This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: back from the bank. 11. No. Because it is a case of past consideration (Kelsoe worked for the company before of the Directors promise), the promise is not enforceable. 13. The adequacy of consideration is irrelevant. The children only gave the property to their father in consideration of his payment of $1 each, because there was the condition that he would leave them the property on his death. 14. Yes. The station announced that it would pay $ 25,000, and it certainly got many listeners because of this advertise. Even though the station made clear that the listens had to hear 3 consecutive songs (without commercial), the station would still be liable for paying the listener that detects the three consecutive songs....
View Full Document
- Spring '10
- Business Law