Chapter 16 Assignment Answers

Chapter 16 Assignment Answers - rise on costs of operations...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Business Law - I Chapter 16 - Assignment Answers Evelyn Tavares 2. No, U.S. West Direct contract was made on the take-it-or-leave-it basis, therefore an adhesion contract and there was a lack of mutuality. 5. There was some solicitation in the letter. Even though the solicitation was not explicit, the person receiving the letter would not see the letter only as a “thanking letter”, since Ewing made clear that he was available, still licensed by the state and qualified to do the pest control work. 7. This sale was illegal, so the law will not enforce. 8. There was no evidence that the Presbyterian Homes charged anything improperly, and Onderdonk knew from the beginning that the monthly payments would rise accordingly to the
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: rise on costs of operations. 9. No. Since Smiths was excluded from working in nearly four-fifths of the states and also in some counties of adjoining states. The restricted area was way too broad. 11. No. The American Security Services had a legitimate interest in protecting its profits by preventing Vodra from soliciting American’s customers; in this case restriction covenant was valid. 14. No, since the state law declares that an unlicensed contractor could not recover compensation under a contract made for the construction of a residence....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 02/29/2012 for the course BUSINESS 101 taught by Professor Monastersky during the Spring '10 term at Bergen Community College.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online