This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: 9. No. The hotel was not vicariously liable for the act of the employee outside of the scope of employment. (Vicarious liability of employer for intentional tort of employee) 10. (Employer’s liability for negligent hiring). Diezel had a bad employment history and Island City had knowledge that Diezel could create problems for them. This makes the employer negligent. 13. (Respondeat superior; course of employment. Judgment for Yellow Cab Company).No. The Yellow Cab Company was not liable for the act of the employee outside of the scope of employment. The employer could not predict that its employee would attack another motorist....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 02/29/2012 for the course BUSINESS 101 taught by Professor Monastersky during the Spring '10 term at Bergen Community College.
- Spring '10
- Business Law