PS7Sol - Econ104(1)

PS7Sol - Econ104(1) - Econ 104 - Problem Set 5 Lorenzo...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Econ 104 - Problem Set 5 Lorenzo Braccini * December 7, 2011 Question 1 a) First note the following: Q s i = Q d i 1 P i = - + u d i- u s i Now consider this fact: Cov( 1 P i ,u s i ) = Cov( - + u d i- u s i ,u s i ) =- Var( u s i ) = 1 Cov( P i ,u s i ) Hence for 1 6 = 0 (in particular we expect 1 > 0) we have that: Cov( P i ,u s i ) =- Var( u s i ) 1 Therefore we can conclude that there is (negative) correlation be- tween P i and u s i . b) No, the OLS estimator is not consistent in this case. In fact: b 1 = 1 + ( 1 n n i =1 P i u s i )- P u s 1 n n i =1 ( P i- P ) 2 * blorenzo@sas.upenn.edu 1 Now note that: 1 n n X i =1 P i u s i- p E [ P i u s i ] = Cov( P i ,u s i ) P u s- p E [ P i ] E [ u s i ] = 0 and that: 1 n n X i =1 ( P i- P ) 2- p Var( P i ) Finally, the last three facts imply that: b 1- p 1 + Cov( P i ,u s i ) Var( P i ) = 1 + ( P,u s ) u s P c) Suppose it exists an observable random variable Z i such that: Cov( Z i ,u s i ) = 0 Cov( P i ,Z i ) 6 = 0 i.e. a valid instrument. I would then estimate and 1 by 2SLS using Z i as instrument for P i . I would then estimate using the sample average of Q d i ....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 02/29/2012 for the course GG 101 taught by Professor Gg during the Spring '12 term at UPenn.

Page1 / 6

PS7Sol - Econ104(1) - Econ 104 - Problem Set 5 Lorenzo...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online