022107_review - Exam Tomorrow Remember to bring Scantron(s)...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–11. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Exam Tomorrow Remember to bring Scantron(s) #2 pencils, sharpened Student ID Your seat assignment Two more review sessions today, 1:00pm and 6:00pm
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Review Session Chapter 8 Metacognition Chapter 10 Theories of Emotion Achievement Motivation Happiness Chapter 16 Effects of Groups Persuasion
Background image of page 2
Most adults cannot learn a new language as easily as children can. Critical or sensitive period: theory that language learning is different before and after puberty (approximately) Cases of isolated children: Fluency and accents Different cortical regions involved
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Metacognition Metacognition: Awareness and understanding of your own cognitive abilities Metacomprehension: Not just understanding something, knowing that and how you understand it Metamemory: Not just remembering thing, knowing what you remember and how you remembered it
Background image of page 4
Effects of Groups Social Facilitation Social Loafing Group Polarization Groupthink Deindividuation
Background image of page 5

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Social Facilitation Tendency to perform one’s dominant responses in the mere presence of others. Mere presence of others: heightened arousal Enhance tendency towards dominant responses If dominant = correct/good, then perf. enhanced If dominant = incorrect/bad, then perf. impaired Cockroaches (Zajonc et al., 1969) Example: Playing video games
Background image of page 6
Social Loafing Tendency to expend less individual effort when working in a group than when working alone. Ringelmann (1913): rope pulling Example: group projects More likely if not monitored, not invested, low motivation, expect others to do it
Background image of page 7

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Group Polarization When like-minded people discuss an issue, “average” opinion becomes more extreme Myers & Bishop (1970) Low prejudice groups discuss racial issues, become more open or understanding Opposite true of high prejudice groups Related to radical terrorism (McCauley, 2002; Merari, 2002). Polarization on the blogosphere
Background image of page 8
Groupthink Tendency of group members to suspend critical thinking because they are striving to seek agreement Example: group project Example: NASA What happens Pressure not to say anything Illusion of unanimity
Background image of page 9

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Deindividuation Loss of individuality leads to disinhibited behavior. Anonymity to outsiders is key
Background image of page 10
Image of page 11
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/07/2008 for the course PSYCH 101 taught by Professor Passer during the Spring '07 term at University of Washington.

Page1 / 34

022107_review - Exam Tomorrow Remember to bring Scantron(s)...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 11. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online