final_2010

# final_2010 - ECE 553 Testing and Testable Design of Digital...

This preview shows pages 1–5. Sign up to view the full content.

ECE 553: Testing and Testable Design of Digital Systems Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Wisconsin–Madison ECE 553 : Testing and Testable Design of Digital Systems Fall 2010-2011 Final Examination CLOSED BOOK Kewal K. Saluja Date: December 21, 2010 Place: Room 1153 Mechanical Engineering Time: 5:05 - 7:05 PM Duration: 120 minutes PROBLEM TOPIC POINTS SCORE 1 Test Economics 12 2 Testability Analysis 13 3 Test Generation 13 4 Memory Test 11 5 Pseudo-exhaustive test 10 6 DFT: Full and Partial scan 11 7 Partial scan 9 8 Boundary Scan 9 9 BIST 12 TOTAL 100 Last Name: First Name: Show your work carefully for both full and partial credit. You will be given credit only for what appears on your exam. Use extra sheets if you need more space to write 1 Fall 2010 (Lec: Saluja, TA: Ganju)

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
ECE 553: Testing and Testable Design of Digital Systems 1. ( 12 points ) Test Economics A manufacturer of ICs uses the following yield equation for its product. Y ( T ) = [1 + Taf/β ] - β In this equation T is fault coverage, a is area of the chip, and f and β are process parameters. The values of the process parameters are as follows: f = 1.48 faults/ sq. cm. and β = 0.14 (a) ( 6 points ) For the area of chip to be 0.95 sq cm and fault coverage to be 94% determine the percent yield and defect level in parts per million (PPM) for this product. (b) ( 6 points ) The manufacturer is not too satisfied with this yield and defect level. It wishes to reduce the defect level to below 1000 PPM but realizes that such a drastic change in defect level will require DFT that will increase the chip area by 10%. The manufacturer will continue to use the the same process for its modified product. i. ( 2 points ) What will be the yield of the modified product if the manufacturer does not change the tests and test strategy? ii. ( 4 points ) Determine the fault coverage the manufacturer will need to meet its goal of reduced defect level. 2 Fall 2010 (Lec: Saluja, TA: Ganju)
ECE 553: Testing and Testable Design of Digital Systems 2. ( 13 points ) Testability Analysis For a part of a large combinational circuit shown in Figure 1, compute the SCOAP controlla- bility and observability values for each line listed in the table below. Some of the values are provided and they are sufficient to deduce all the remaining values. Some of the values may in the table for your consistency check. A A1 A2 B C D E F F1 F2 G H I Figure 1: Testability analysis values Line # CC0 CC1 CO Line # CC0 CC1 CO A 30 A2 30 B F 70 74 C 25 30 F1 70 D 50 20 F2 70 E 12 35 37 G 51 46 50 H A1 30 I 3 Fall 2010 (Lec: Saluja, TA: Ganju)

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
ECE 553: Testing and Testable Design of Digital Systems 3. ( 13 points ) Test Generation Consider the combinational circuit given below. A PODEM like test generator creates a decision tree shown below during the test generation process for the fault marked (line L stuck-at 0) in the circuit.
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.
• Winter '08
• ece553
• Automatic test pattern generation, Linear feedback shift register, Scan chain, Testable Design of Digital Systems, Testable Design

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### What students are saying

• As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

• I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

• The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern