Vargo (2004) Evolving to a New Dominant Logic

Vargo (2004) Evolving to a New Dominant Logic - Stephen L....

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
A New Dominant Logic / 1 Journal of Marketing Vol. 68 (January 2004), 1–17 Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing Marketing inherited a model of exchange from economics, which had a dominant logic based on the exchange of “goods,” which usually are manufactured output. The dominant logic focused on tangible resources, embedded value, and transactions. Over the past several decades, new perspectives have emerged that have a revised logic focused on intangible resources, the cocreation of value, and relationships. The authors believe that the new per- spectives are converging to form a new dominant logic for marketing, one in which service provision rather than goods is fundamental to economic exchange. The authors explore this evolving logic and the corresponding shift in perspective for marketing scholars, marketing practitioners, and marketing educators. Stephen L. Vargo is Visiting Professor of Marketing, Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland (e-mail: svargo@rhsmith.umd. edu). Robert F. Lusch is Dean and Distinguished University Professor, M.J. Neeley School of Business, Texas Christian University, and Professor of Marketing (on leave), Eller College of Business and Public Administration, University of Arizona (e-mail: r.lusch@tcu.edu). The authors contributed equally to this manuscript. The authors thank the anonymous JM review- ers and Shelby Hunt, Gene Laczniak, Alan Malter, Fred Morgan, and Matthew O’Brien for comments on various drafts of this manuscript. T he formal study of marketing focused at first on the distribution and exchange of commodities and manu- factured products and featured a foundation in eco- nomics (Marshall 1927; Shaw 1912; Smith 1904). The first marketing scholars directed their attention toward com- modities exchange (Copeland 1920), the marketing institu- tions that made goods available and arranged for possession (Nystrom 1915; Weld 1916), and the functions that needed to be performed to facilitate the exchange of goods through marketing institutions (Cherington 1920; Weld 1917). By the early 1950s, the functional school began to morph into the marketing management school, which was characterized by a decision-making approach to managing the marketing functions and an overarching focus on the customer (Drucker 1954; Levitt 1960; McKitterick 1957). McCarthy (1960) and Kotler (1967) characterized marketing as a decision-making activity directed at satisfying the cus- tomer at a profit by targeting a market and then making opti- mal decisions on the marketing mix, or the “4 P’s.” The fun- damental foundation and the tie to the standard economic model continued to be strong. The leading marketing man- agement textbook in the 1970s (Kotler 1972, p. 42, empha- sis in original) stated that “marketing management seeks to determine the settings of the company’s marketing decision variables that will maximize the company’s objective(s) in the light of the expected behavior of noncontrollable
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 17

Vargo (2004) Evolving to a New Dominant Logic - Stephen L....

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online