parliament vs president

parliament vs president - Parliamentarism vs....

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Parliamentarism vs. Presidentialism Adolph Hitler once said, “what luck for rulers that men do not think.” This remark is a sobering reminder of how some leaders may manipulate and control the masses of society. History books are filled with examples of men that will take advantage of poor social situations and exploit these situations for their own gain. Yet, some countries have had more dubious leaders than others, and some have been seemingly unable to get out of the rule of tyrannical leaders all together, for extended periods of time. African and Latin American continents provide numerous illustrations of this point. Every country and every continent at one point or another had some sort of authoritarian rule. Though a great of these countries have eventually become democracies, especially since the beginning of the third wave of democracy, some have yet to conform to the global standard of democracy. Numerous political scientist have tried to answer the question, are presidential regimes less stable than parliamentary regimes? When answering a question as complicated as one about governing social institutions, political scientists often use complex formulas or statistics, as do Przeworski, Alvares, Cheibub, and Limongi in their article, “What makes democracy Endure?” They give an economic viewpoint using the survival story method to explain certain causes of the stability, or the lack there of to explain a state. Przeworski et al (1996) came up with the magic number of $6,000. This is the amount of GDP per capita that once reached, “democracies are impregnable and can be expected to live forever.” So, then, once regimes reach this magic number and have the choice of democratic institutions, what choice should they make? Przeworski et al. (1996) consider the percent of parliamentary, presidential, as well as mixed regime cases that eventually abandoned their form of government and the length of time it took for them to abandon it. They simply go on to make the claim that due to economic factors, as well as others, “presidential democracies
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
are less durable at almost every level.” However, this is hardly an unbiased or fair presumption
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 03/08/2012 for the course PLSC 1340 taught by Professor Sakamoto during the Spring '07 term at SMU.

Page1 / 4

parliament vs president - Parliamentarism vs....

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online