week1 discussion

week1 discussion - would not be too tough So the people...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
In what ways would a foreign policy based on the logic of hegemonism be morally appropriate and in what ways would it be morally objectionable? Hegemony is the leadership or predominant influence exercised by one nation over others, as in a confederation. I think that a foreign policy based on the logic of hegemonism would be morally appropriate when there is a good leader who was in power. But he is not in total control over the people. Therefore, I think that the leader should let people have a say and the policy
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: would not be too tough. So the people would always comfortable with the policy. The leader should always choose the right choice. I think it would be morally objectionable when the leader had complete dominance over the people. The leader would not allow the people have a say. The leader would always make a aggressive policy. The people feel strongly dislike of Policy formalist....
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Ask a homework question - tutors are online