{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

♥Political Ideas and Ideologies Unit-14 Power, Authority and Legitimacy

♥Political Ideas and Ideologies Unit-14 Power, Authority and Legitimacy

Info icon This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
5 Political Obligation and Revolution UNIT 14 POWER AND AUTHORITY Structure 14.0 Objectives 14.1 Introduction 14.2 Power: Meaning of the Concept 14.2.1 Distinction Between Power and Related Themes 14.2.2 Implications of Power 14.3 The Power Theory 14.3.1 Liberal Democratic Theory 14.3.2 Marxian Theory 14.3.3 Michael Foucault on Power 14.4 What is Authority? 14.5 Classification of Authority 14.6 Distinction between the Concepts of Power and Authority 14.6.1 Implications of Authority 14.7 Let Us Sum Up 14.8 Key Words 14.9 Some Useful References 14.10 Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises 14.0 OBJECTIVES The unit deals with the most significant area of fundamental research; namely, Power and Authority. It is the central theme of political ideology. After going through this unit, you should be able to: Understand the concept of power in its varied ramifications Differentiate between power and related themes Explain the concept of authority and identify its types Understand the relative meaning of Power and Authority 14.1 INTRODUCTION Recently, the idea of power has assumed an importance of its own, in the realm of political theory. This is so because the meaning of politics has changed from one of being a ‘study of state and government’ to that of being a ‘study of power’. Power is the primary objective of foreign policy. In international relations, power is the capacity of a state to influence or control the behaviour of other states for the purpose of promoting its own vital interest. Power capacity includes skills and techniques in the use of consent and constraint, as well as the ability to persuade, threaten or coerce to gain ascendancy over other states. States vary notably in power capacity. Belgium and Switzerland are probably evenly matched, but the mismatch between Belgium and United States is apparent. Some states are characterized as ‘haves’ and the others as ‘have-nots’. The former are well endowed with the assets of power, while the latter seek to better their position at the expense of the “haves”. This situation gives power struggle its essential character.
Image of page 1

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon