mthsc810-lecture14-1x2

mthsc810-lecture14-1x2 - MthSc 810 Mathematical Programming...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
MthSc 810: Mathematical Programming Lecture 14 Pietro Belotti Dept. of Mathematical Sciences Clemson University October 25, 2011 Reading for today: Section 4.6 and 4.7 Reading for Oct. 27: Section 4.8-4.10 Midterm 2: Next Tuesday, 2pm–3:15pm Farkas’ lemma Lemma Consider A R m × n and b R m . Then (1) x 0 such that A x = b , or (2) p such that p A 0 and p b < 0, but not both. Therefore, either a (non-negative) solution to a system of equations, or a solution to a system of inequalities (one of which strict).
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Proof (easy) We need to prove that ( 1 ) ⇒ ¬ ( 2 ) and ¬ ( 1 ) ( 2 ) . ( 1 ) ⇒ ¬ ( 2 ) : If x 0 , A x = b , and p A 0 , then p b = p A | {z } 0 x 0 , a contradiction. ¬ ( 1 ) ( 2 ) : Consider the primal-dual pair P : max 0 x D : min p b s . t . A x = b s . t . p A 0 x 0 ¬ ( 1 ) ( x 0 : A x = b ) P is infeasible. p = 0 is feasible for D , which must then be unbounded There exists a feasible p such that p b < 0 More on Farkas’ lemma Corollary 4.3 Consider A R m × n and b R m . If, for any p
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 03/14/2012 for the course MTHSC 810 taught by Professor Staff during the Fall '08 term at Clemson.

Page1 / 5

mthsc810-lecture14-1x2 - MthSc 810 Mathematical Programming...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online