essay question 8

essay question 8 - Has the Supreme Court done an adequate...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Has the Supreme Court done an adequate job in developing clear and appropriate guidelines for the interpretation of the First Amendment Religion Clauses? The Supreme Court has evolved their interpretation of the religion clauses that has been unclear and confusing to know the general rules. In 1879, Reynolds v. United States ruled in favor of a Utah statute outlawing polygamy. Reynolds argued that this was a part of his religion and failure to engage in this practice would cause eternal damnation. The Court upheld th Jefferson theory that there should be no exceptions for religiously motivated conduct and you have to follow the laws like everyone else. This outlined the “Belief- Conduct Distinction. However, in 1940, Cantwell v. Connecticut, the court ruled in favor of Cantwell determining that the state should play no role in determining what religious causes are, and no longer would the belief—conduct distinctions be applicable. In line with this way of thought, the court determined in Sherbert a test to determine if religious
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 03/26/2012 for the course POL 353 taught by Professor Dameron during the Fall '11 term at Miami University.

Page1 / 2

essay question 8 - Has the Supreme Court done an adequate...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online