Trade Relationships and Agreements

Trade Relationships and Agreements - Trade Relationships...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Trade Relationships and Agreements: Extension of Washington Concesnusmovement of Free Trade swept through the Americas o mid 1980s: Argentina and Brazil initiated negotiations for what would ultimately be a four-country partnership including Uruguay and Paraguay o 1990 US and Canada accepted Mexicos proposal to begin discussions for a free trade area o 1990 US President Bush proposed development of a free trade zone embracing the entire western hemisphere seeking to overcome the painful crisis of the 1980s, leaders throughout LA came to regard free trade as an essential part of any long-term solution movement immersed the western hemisphere in process of regional integration which entailed the removal of state-imposed barriers to the mutual exchange of goods, services, capital, or persons FTA and establishment of common markets NAFTA o Took effect in 1994building a bilateral free-trade accord between US and Canadacreated one of the 2 largest trading blocs in the world Population of 370 million and combined economic production of $6 trillion by 1992 NAFTA promoted free flow of goods between member countries eliminating duties, tariffs, and trade barriers over a 15 year period NA Late 1980s Mexican president Salinas says Mexico needs jobs o First turns to Europe for investment and jobsproblem was after the wall fell, East Germany opened up for trade and EU had favorable trading with the EU o Mexico turns to US 1991 Mexico is not very democratic Agricultural sector should have been oppressed because not very efficient and unable to compete with US agricultural sectorcaused job loss Small scale businesses wouldnt be able to compete with large US chains Manufacture workerscould benefit but overall make them more dependent on US trade Argument for PRO NAFTA in Mexico: would double benefits because preferential treatment If joined MERCASUR instead might have had less investment and trade because dealing with weaker economies Mexico joined NAFTA : Hopes to preserve peacehoped NAFTA would attract investment, stimulate employment, and provide meaningful opportunity for one million persons entering the job market every year NAFTA offered President Salinas an opportunity to institutionalize and perpetuate his economic reforms o Salinista program of structural readjustment became part of an international treaty Mexico was seeking international benediction for its not- quite-democratic regime o Prospects for democratization became a matter of debate Mexico believed NAFTA would provide the country with diplomatic leverage over LA and the rest of the Third world o Links with Canada and US would link Mexico with advanced industrial democracies and leaders of the first world o Mexico would serve as a bridge between the developing world and the developed world All of these hopes were upset on 1/1/1994 when NAFTA went into effect: A guerilla movement in the poverty-stricken state of...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 03/26/2012 for the course POL 378 taught by Professor Zeigler during the Spring '08 term at Miami University.

Page1 / 10

Trade Relationships and Agreements - Trade Relationships...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online