This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full DocumentThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full DocumentThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full DocumentThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full DocumentThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full DocumentThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full DocumentThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: MA1104 Multivariable Calculus Lecture 21 Dr KU Cheng Yeaw Monday April 6, 2009 Recap Last lecture ... • we defined surface integrals (flux) of vector fields ZZ S F · d S = ZZ S F · n dS . We can evaluate these integrals using parametrization r ( u,v ) of the surface S • we stated (without proof)the Divergence Theorem which turns a surface integral into a triple integral under certain conditions. This becomes another way to compute surface integrals. Overview In this lecture ... • we shall prove the Divergence Theorem. • we shall learn the Stoke’s Theorem The Divergence Theorem (Gauss Theorem) The Divergence Theorem Let E be a simple solid region and let S be the boundary surface of E , given with positive (outward) orientation. Let F be a vector field whose component functions have continuous partial derivatives on an open region that contains E . Then, ZZ S F · d S = ZZZ E div F dV. Here simple solid E means that E is of type 1, type 2 and type 3. Recall that a solid region is type 1 if it lies between the graphs of two continuous functions of x and y , that is E = { ( x,y,z ) : ( x,y ) ∈ D, u 1 ( x,y ) ≤ z ≤ u 2 ( x,y ) } where D is the projection of E onto the xyplane. Similarly, type 2 (type 3 respectively) solid lies between the graphs of two continuous functions of y and z ( x and z respectively) Type 1 Solid Type 2 Solid Type 3 Solid Proof of Divergence Theorem The Divergence Theorem we stated is for the boundary (surface) of a simple solid. In fact, it holds for any piecewise smooth closed surface. Lets prove the Divergence Theorem (for simple solid): Let F ( x,y,z ) = P ( x,y,z ) i + Q ( x,y,z ) j + R ( x,y,z ) k . Then div F = ∂P ∂x + ∂Q ∂y + ∂R ∂z Hence, the righthand side of the equation in the Divergence Theorem becomes ZZZ E div F dV = ZZZ E ∂P ∂x dV + ZZZ E ∂Q ∂y dV + ZZZ E ∂R ∂z dV Now, we look at the lefthand side of the equation in the Divergence Theorem: ZZ S F · d S Notice, given the outward unit normal n , we have ZZ S F · d S = ZZ S ( P i + Q j + R k ) · n dS = ZZ S P i · n dS + ZZ S Q j · n dS + ZZ S R k · n dS Comparing with the righthand side, it remains to prove the following equations: ZZ S P i · n dS = ZZZ E ∂P ∂x dV ZZ S Q j · n dS = ZZZ E ∂Q ∂y dV ZZ S R k · n dS = ZZZ E ∂R ∂z dV We shall prove the last one. The proofs of the first two are similar. To prove ZZ S R k · n dS = ZZZ E ∂R ∂z dV we use the fact that...
View
Full Document
 Spring '08
 Kuchengyeaw
 Integrals, Multivariable Calculus, Vector Calculus, Stokes' theorem

Click to edit the document details