Peer_Rating_of_Ensemble__Members

Peer_Rating_of_Ensemble__Members - Peer Rating of Ensemble...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Peer Rating of Ensemble  Members Your Name_Catherine Rivas_________Your Group___Indian Culture__  Please write the names of all of your group members, INCLUDING YOURSELF, and rate the  degree to which each member fulfilled his/her responsibilities in completing the team  assignments.  DO NOT LEAVE ANY COMMENTARY BLANK!  Please send to dropbox.  The possible ratings are as follows:  Excellent:  Consistently carried more than his/her fair share of the workload.  Very good:  Consistently did what he/she was supposed to do, very well prepared and  cooperative.  Satisfactory:  Usually did what he/she was supposed to do, acceptably prepared and cooperative.  Ordinary:  Often did what he/she was supposed to do, minimally prepared and cooperative.  Marginal:  Sometimes failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared.  Deficient:  Often failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared. 
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 03/20/2012 for the course BUS LAW 320 taught by Professor Soos during the Spring '10 term at Rutgers.

Page1 / 2

Peer_Rating_of_Ensemble__Members - Peer Rating of Ensemble...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online