Lecture 4 - Lecture 4 15:31 Difference between the...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Lecture 4 15:31 Difference between the presumption of innocence and the presumption of guilt (one is practical and one is legal) Innocence: Considered innocent by the law until proven guilty Guilt: A prediction about the outcome of the case (if all the good evidence shows that he/she is guilty then will have a guilty verdict) Presumption of Guilt (pg 8): Or Presumption of sufficient evidence If every piece of evidence I have will be admissible in court, this person will very likely be found guilty. Objective: pragmatic/practical; I only want to spend time on cases that will lead to a conviction. Presumption of Innocence (pg 9, 14): We, and nobody else, determine if you are guilty under the LAW. Facts alone are not enough. They need to be clean. Until we have not heard everything you are innocent. Objective: Safeguarding proper procedure...
View Full Document

Page1 / 4

Lecture 4 - Lecture 4 15:31 Difference between the...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online