This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Math 1a: Limit Laws (Solutions) September 16, 2009 1. Let f be a function such that f (2 . 01) = 0, f (2 . 001) = 0, f (2 . 0001) = 0, and so on. Can we conclude that lim x 2 f ( x ) = 0? Solution. No, we cannot. To conclude that lim x 2 f ( x ) = 0, we must know that for any x sufficiently close to 2, f ( x ) is close to 0 and not just for x of the form 2 . 01, 2 . 001, 2 . 0001 etc. 2. Suppose we know that lim x 5 f ( x ) = 3. Which of the following must be true? 1. f (5) = 3; 2. f is defined at 5; 3. if f is defined at 5 then f (5) = 3; 4. there is a number x such that f ( x ) < 3 . 05; (hint: look for x near 5) 5. there is a number x such that f ( x ) > 2 . 95; Solution. (a), (b), (c) are false. In general, in dealing with lim x a f ( x ), the behavior of f at a is irrelevant. (d) and (e) are true. Since lim x 5 f ( x ) = 3, if we take any x sufficiently close to 5, then f ( x ) will be within distance 0 . 05 of 3. That is, for an x sufficiently close to 5 (but not equal to 5), we have 2...
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 03/27/2012 for the course MATH 1a taught by Professor Benedictgross during the Fall '09 term at Harvard.
 Fall '09
 BenedictGross
 Math

Click to edit the document details