Tutor _ Review _ Exam II - 1 What is the"state of nature...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
1. What is the "state of nature"? Bad world; nasty, brutish, short, poor, solitary Better world: pleasant, nice, long, rich, communication To get into the spirit of this theory, imagine what would happen tomorrow if the government,  police, courts, etc. all disappeared…  • Hobbes called such anarchy in the “state of nature”.  • He famously said life for a human being in a state of nature would be “solitary, poor, nasty,  brutish, and short.” (p.81)  2. According to Hobbes, what facts about human life can lead to state of nature? For Hobbes, what produces such grim prospects in the state of nature are four facts about human  life and nature.  1. We all have equality of need.  2. There is scarcity of resources.  Conflict/Competition 3. Humans are basically equal in power.  4. Humans have only limited altruism.  • Given these facts about human life and nature, Hobbes held that we must find a way to  cooperate, else we will suffer or die 3. According to Social Contract Theory, when is civil disobedience morally acceptable? Break contract if not mutually beneficial: segregation It is the most natural and reasonable means of expressing protest.  For when the disadvantaged  are denied the benefits of social living, they are released from the contract that would otherwise  require them to follow society’s rules.  This is the deepest argument for civil disobedience, and  the Social Contract Theory presents it clearly and forcefully (p. 92). 4. What are some advantages of the Social Contract Theory? Create a set of rules and justifications that are suppose to improve quality of life 1. It suggests what moral rules we should follow and how those rules are justified.  • Rules are justified if they promote living harmoniously together for mutual benefit.  Question: How do you think a Social Contractarian would view laws opposed to same-sex  marriage?  2. It tells us why we should follow the rules: mutual benefit and fear of punishment.  Question: How would a Social Contractarian view laws against littering?  3. It indicates when it is rational to break the rules: namely, we agree to obey the rules on the  condition that others obey them as well.  N.B. Consider Martin Luther King’s reasons for non-violently breaking the laws.  4. It preserves the distinction between dutiful acts and supererogatory acts.  • As we will see, not all moral theories do this (e.g. utilitarianism). 5.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 03/27/2012 for the course FINA 1307 taught by Professor Friday during the Spring '11 term at Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi.

Page1 / 7

Tutor _ Review _ Exam II - 1 What is the"state of nature...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online