This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: The Boy argues that even if did lack capacity to form a contract, the clerk at the card store sold him the baseball card for $12 and the boy paid for the asking price. The boy argues that Disaffirmance is a right by the minor to avoid the contract as a shield to protect against adults, in this case the adult may not invoke disaffirmance as he is not a minor. Conclusion No Johnson may not recover his baseball card due to lack of capacity, because the right form disaffirmance is to minors....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 03/28/2012 for the course BLAW 280 taught by Professor Ng during the Spring '11 term at CSU Northridge.
- Spring '11
- Business Law