This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: Both parties agree that after the expiration of the 2002 agreement, CBC's continued use of the information was without consent. CBC is using the MLB players names and their likeness to operate the fantasy sports business, this constitutes intent to obtain commercial advantage. CBC does make use of the various players, but no single player is vouching or supporting CBC, it is understood that no commercial advantage is gained from any single player. Conclusion : No, CBC is not liable for invasion of privacy because the freedom of speech permits the use of information available in public domain and they are not gaining a commercial advantage. Had CBC lost they would have been liable for compensatory and with the proof of intent, punitive damages....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 03/28/2012 for the course BLAW 280 taught by Professor Ng during the Spring '11 term at CSU Northridge.
- Spring '11
- Business Law