Currie Brief - Currie v Chevron U.S.A Inc Issue Is Chevron liable for negligence to Currie Rule Negligence 1)existence of a legal duty to the

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Currie v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. Issue : Is Chevron liable for negligence to Currie? Rule : Negligence : 1)existence of a legal duty to the plaintiff 2)the defendant breached the duty 3)the plaintiff was injured 4) the defendants breach of duty caused the injury. Proximate cause : An act from which an injury results as a natural, direct, uninterrupted consequence and without which the injury would not have occurred. foreseeability : reasonably anticipate that damage or injury will probably ensue from acts or omissions Application : The events took place on the property of Chevron, where they owe a legal duty to Currie. The Chevron employee breached the duty, when she saw the conflict, noticed the lack of nearby vehicle or gas container and still activated pump number one. With the use of the gas from pump number 1, Currie was doused in gasoline and set on fire. The only way Currie could be set on fire with the gasoline, is with the authorization of the Chevron attendant. Chevron agrees the events took place at a Chevron Property. The defendant did not breach the
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 03/28/2012 for the course BLAW 280 taught by Professor Ng during the Spring '11 term at CSU Northridge.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online