This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: no need to inform the family and close friends because they do not know the defendant and can't help against the stalking. The plaintiff only shared the information to prevent any harm from befalling the plaintiff. The defendant was not stalking the walking, and the statements were said due to rivalry between plaintiff and defendant while working at ANI. The plaintiff did not seriously think she was being stalked because, she did not seek help from her close family. Conclusion : No, the defendant is not abusing conditional privilege, because the plaintiff only shared the information with parties able to protect the interest and for the purposes of the plaintiffs safety. Her information was not a defamation as no counter argument was given for the defendants doubt of the plaintiff being worried about being stalked....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 03/28/2012 for the course BLAW 280 taught by Professor Ng during the Spring '11 term at CSU Northridge.
- Spring '11
- Business Law