Unformatted text preview: Star Chevrolet argues that even if Green was a minor, it was his duty to restore Star Chevrolet to a condition before the contract in this case, for the use of the used car during the several months driven and the value they would have gotten from a different seller. Star Chevrolet that the car was necessary to Green's living, because he used it to travel to work, and if it was possible to always car pool without a car of his own, Green would not have purchased the car.\ Conclusion Yes Green can disaffirm the contract with Star Chevrolet because he was not in capacity to contract. But Green should assume some liability for use of the car and not receive a full refund....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 03/28/2012 for the course BLAW 280 taught by Professor Ng during the Spring '11 term at CSU Northridge.
- Spring '11
- Business Law