Unformatted text preview: procedure. Holt suffered economic detrainment when on July 9, two senior Home Depot managers terminated Holt's employment, his loss of employment is cause for economic detriment. Home Depot argues that they made to definite promise to Holt that he could reasonable rely, because of disclaimers of contractual intent contain in Holts handbook and employment application. Home depot also argues that even if there was a promise, Holt did not rely because there is no evidence he used the open-door procedure to complain about Gray. Home Depot argues that Holt's employment was terminated because of his incompetence, insubordination and violating an ethics policy not for his complaint about Gray. Conclusion Yes Holt may recover with promissory estoppel because all of the elements were met....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 03/28/2012 for the course BLAW 280 taught by Professor Ng during the Spring '11 term at CSU Northridge.
- Spring '11
- Business Law