This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: the correct amount and by the specified date. Hall had received the payment, as it was certified mail and the insurance company deposited the check on March 22. Okosa argues that the letter was sent with payment, through the agreed communication method (mail) based on the prior dealings, and sent on the March 15 by certified mail to meet the deadline of March 16. Hall argues the intention of Okosa to accept the contract, because they failed to make the original payment by February 28 and when hall offered to extend the payment day, Okosa waited last minute (March 15) to forward the payments. Hall agrees that they received the promissory of payment via a check, but only got paid on March 22. Hall agrees that the offer was communicated. Conclusion Yes Okosa did send an acceptance letter based on the mailbox rule, and the fact that Okosa followed all the conditions of the offer set by Hall....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 03/28/2012 for the course BLAW 280 taught by Professor Ng during the Spring '11 term at CSU Northridge.
- Spring '11
- Business Law