RMV PC2 Brief - Gaile Nixon (R.M.V mother) v. Chalmette's...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Gaile Nixon (R.M.V mother) v. Chalmette's owner and Property Manager Issue : Can Gaile Nixon recover for negligence by Chalmette's owner and Property Manager? Rules : Proximate Cause : An act from which an injury results as a natural, direct, uninterrupted consequence and without which the injury would not have occurred. Negligence : 1)existence of a legal duty to the plaintiff 2)the defendant breached the duty 3)the plaintiff was injured 4) the defendants breach of duty caused the injury. foreseeability : reasonably anticipate that damage or injury will probably ensue from acts or omissions. Application : Gaile argues that had the Chalmette's owner and Property manager properly maintained and secured the apartment premises, her daughter R.M.V may not have been raped, due to the unavailability of a close, private and abandoned area. They owner and manager should have foreseen the occurrence of the crime, because of the previous crimes that have occurred in the same location. They breached the duty by not following city regulations and installing a
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 03/28/2012 for the course BLAW 280 taught by Professor Ng during the Spring '11 term at CSU Northridge.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online