This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: a non accredited school he was unable to enter New Jersey Bar. The Dean argues that the law school was working on the accreditation process but never mentioned the school is accredited or when the accreditation will take place, only informed Rodi not to be pessimistic about the processes. The Dean had no knowledge of any falsity as he simply stated Rodi there is no cause for pessimism about accreditation. Dean also argues that Rodi had no justifiable reliance because Rodi needed the accreditation and since the school did not have it after his first year, it was his choice to continue. Rodi has not proven an actual economic loss by not receiving a law degree from an accredited school, he simply may not sit for the New Jersey Bar. Conclusion No the Dean is not liable for Fraud against Rodi as all of the elements for Fraud were not met....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 03/28/2012 for the course BLAW 280 taught by Professor Ng during the Spring '11 term at CSU Northridge.
- Spring '11
- Business Law