This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: that was used by Meagher during driving, which was responsible for the accident. Cingular owes no duty to the use of the phones furnished to clients. Cingular did not breach any duty, because they are not liable as to the use of the phone sold to Meagher. We agree that Terry was injured. In no way was it foreseeable, that issuing a phone to Meagher would result in an injury to Terry. Conlusion : No Cingular is not liable for negligence to Terry, because the requirements are not met. Cingular could not predict that issuing a phone to Meagher would result into injuries to others, and they are not responsible for the use of the phone. In different circumstance Terry would get compensatory damages for medical expenses, repair costs and lost wages. Terry may not seek punitive damages, as there was no intent involved in the case....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 03/28/2012 for the course BLAW 280 taught by Professor Ng during the Spring '11 term at CSU Northridge.
- Spring '11
- Business Law