Theoretical Comparisions

Theoretical Comparisions - $ E 3 2 . 2 9 d ) X * k k c d C...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: $ E 3 2 . 2 9 d ) X * k k c d C , m 5 5 E d ) m s E- 3 .- . ,+ z s z E ; : . 3 C , 2 . 2 G 3 3 . O F 4 . 3 C ,- *- s i . g 'a Q d ) E . 3 2 % , % d o 5 % Q C , r d 2 5 2 E .a , , . H e ; z E c d 2 % g- 2 .& 2 C , G Q g + 2 b- Q G o 'a z " B m C , E z . 5 & g z . 5 c a , +- !- m 5 Q g m O- C M , o Structural functionalism neglects consideration of conditions in which "social solidarity" brings about conflict. ConflictMarxism, in turn, minimizes the role of conflict in fostering cooperation and integration Functionalism offers a conservative view of society. Conditions of inequality are necessary to maximize functionality. Conversely, Marxism is a radical approach for social change i.e. "revolution" is the means to abolish the status quo of inequality and conflict Structural-functionalism claims the goal of objectivity for conducting sociological research. ConflictlMarxism rejects the goal of objectivity and emphasizes "praxis" in research Functionalism assumes consensus of values as the basis for social...
View Full Document

Page1 / 5

Theoretical Comparisions - $ E 3 2 . 2 9 d ) X * k k c d C...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online