Ch5-W12 - Chapter 5: Comparison Methods Part 2 Internal...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–8. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Chapter 5: Comparison Methods Part 2 Example 5-1. Consider two mutually exclusive investments. The first costs $10 today and returns $13 in one year. The second costs $1000 and returns $1250 in one year. Which is the preferred investment? Your MARR is 20%. (You cannot take “multiples” of the investments.)
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Example 5-2. Revisit the 1-storey versus 2-storey example: N = 20 years MARR = 4%/yr (a)Calculate the Internal Rates of Return for each building. (b)Choose the better plan, based on an IRR analysis. 1-Storey 2-Storey First Cost $250,000 $400,000 Annual Rent Revenue $26,000 per year $40,000 per year Annual Cost $4,000 per year $6,000 per year
Background image of page 2
Generalizing IRR Analysis: One Independent Proposal • given estimates of receipts R t , disbursements D t ( R 0 = 0 ) find i = IRR as the discount rate such that: 0 ) 1 ( ... ) 1 ( ) 1 ( ) ( 2 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 = + - + + + - + + - + - = T T T i D R i D R i D R D R i PW if i MARR, then the proposal is acceptable if i < MARR, then the proposal is rejected Important Question: Does IRR procedure agree with Present Worth Procedure ?
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Does IRR Method Agree with PW Method ? (One Proposal) Assume: 1.Proposal is profitable without discounting: 2.First cost for t = 0, followed by positive net cash flows: = = = - T t t t i PW D R 0 0 ) 0 ( ) ( T t D R D D R t t , ... , 2 , 1 for 0 , 0 0 0 0 = - < - = - i i=IRR , where PW ( i )=0 -D 0 PW(0) ( 29 ( 29 ( 29 ( 29 ( 29 ( 29 ( 29 0 1 ) ( ... 1 ) ( 2 1 ) ( 1 ) ( ... 1 ) ( 1 ) ( 1 3 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 0 < + - - - + - - + - - = + - + + + - + + - + - = + T T T T T T i D R T i D R i D R i D R i D R i D R D di d di i PW d Therefore, ( 29 ( 29 0 1 1 1 0 1 ) ( ... 1 ) ( lim D i D R i D R D T T T i - = + - + + + - + -
Background image of page 4
If IRR MARR , then geometry of the graph implies PW ( MARR ) 0: If IRR < MARR , then geometry of the graph implies PW ( MARR ) < 0: i =MARR i =IRR i =MARR i =IRR
Background image of page 5

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
PW < 0 IRR < MARR PW = 0 IRR = MARR PW > 0 IRR > MARR Conclusion: Under the assumptions , PW and IRR methods agree. = = = - T t t t i PW D R 0 0 ) 0 ( ) ( T t D R D D R t t , ... , 2 , 1 for 0 , 0 0 0 0 = - < - = - The assumptions, again:
Background image of page 6
Alternative Definitions of IRR It is the interest rate such that: PW = 0, or PW(receipts) = PW(disbursements) FW = 0, or FW(receipts) = FW(disbursements) AW = 0, or AW(receipts) = AW(disbursements) T T T T T T T i D i
Background image of page 7

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 8
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 04/01/2012 for the course MSCI 261 taught by Professor Bonkoo during the Winter '09 term at Waterloo.

Page1 / 23

Ch5-W12 - Chapter 5: Comparison Methods Part 2 Internal...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 8. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online