Lab 3- Conservation of Linear Momentum (final)

Lab 3- Conservation of Linear Momentum (final) - Section...

Info icon This preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Section #: 003 Experiment #: 3 Date performed: 10-15-08 Date due: 10-29-08 CONSERVATION OF LINEAR MOMENTUM Principal investigator: Sudipa Chowdhury_____________________________________ Skeptic: Andrew Denmark_______________________________________ Researcher: Jenny Ross____________________________________________ TA: Sandu________________________________________________ Role I DC AD RC Q1 Q2 PI PG I introduction DC data and calculation AD analysis and discussion RC results and conclusion Q1/Q2 quiz/prelab PI principal investigator points PG personal grade
Image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
1) Introduction P1.1 The first step of the experiment was to determine the initial velocity of the steel ball as it left the projectile launcher. In order to do this, the masses of the steel ball and the steel cart were found using a triple beam balance. The steel cart was too big to be measured as a whole unit, so its two parts were individually weighed. P1.2 After each part was massed, the experiment was set up. The projectile launcher was placed at the end of the track, with the cart set 5 cm away from this end. In this manner, the projectile could be caught by the cart at a distance of 5 cm down the track. The carpenter’s level was used to make sure that the launcher was aligned and leveled. The cart track itself also had to be leveled. Once this was all in place, we were careful not to move it in any way. P1.3 The photogate was aligned with the projectile so that the center of the ball would pass through the photo beam. This was crucial, as the distance being measured needed to be the diameter. If the ball was not aligned right, the distance would cut through a different part of the ball and be shorter than the radius, thus affecting the initial velocity measurement. P1.4 The ball was loaded into the launcher at the “medium range” setting and fired five times. Each time the cart caught the ball and moved. Before the next trial, the cart was replaced at 5 cm. The time for each trial was recorded from the photogate timer, making sure the reading was in seconds. P1.5 The second part of the experiment involved determining the velocity of the system after the ball and cart collided. To measure this, a TI-83 calculator was connected to the TI-CBR, a sonic motion detector, through a cable cord. The “RANGER” program from the TI-CBR was then transmitted to the TI-83 calculator.
Image of page 2
P1.6 The projectile launcher was reloaded, the cart was replaced at 5cm, and the TI- CBR was placed 1.5m down the track. The alignment was rechecked with the carpenter’s level to make sure everything was positioned with the track. P1.7 The projectile was fired and its movement was documented. The track was not moved around while this was happening, as any movement could have interfered with the data. Upon completion, the graph of the velocity vs. time data recorded by the TI-83 calculator was downloaded onto the computer. P1.8 Unfortunately, the first time this experiment was completed, it was not very accurate. The graph did not have the correct shape, and upon using the data, the percent error was deemed to be too large. Thus, we redid the lab a second time to obtain the correct results. The equipment listed is the equipment used for the second trial we performed, and the calculations and data are the results of this second trial as well.
Image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 4
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern