PHIL_200_december2004 - final

PHIL_200_december2004 - final - FACULTY OF ARTS FINAL...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Background image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: FACULTY OF ARTS FINAL EXAMINATION PHILOSOPHY 107-200A INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY I Examiner: Prof. Storts McCall Associate Examiner: Darren Bifford Date: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 Time: 93111 — 12pm Instructions: Answer ONE question from EACH section. No notes or texts are permitted in the examination. You may keep the exam. This exam comprises 2 pages, including the cover page. Philosophy 200A: Final Exam. Section A. 1. Could the theory of Forms be used to resolve disagreements about what is right and what is wrong? 2. Does Plato’s theory of recollection prove the immortality of the soul? Why or why not? 3. Pericles was considered a virtuous man. His sons were not. According to Socrates, docs Pericles have knowledge of virtue? Or does he merely have right opinion concerning it? Explain your answer. Section B. 1. Does Descartes” ontological argument. for the existence of God have the same degree of selfievidenee as his Cogito Ergo Sum? 2. Explain Descartes’ method of doubt and its importance to the pursuit of knowledge. 3. How does Descartes think that we can prevent ourselves from falling into error? Section C. 1. In what sense is Russell a Platonist? 2. Explain what Russell means by “knowledge by acquaintance” and “knowledge by description”. \Vhich kind of knowledge do we have about the past? 3. “Here’s one white swan; here’s another Therefore all swans are white!” According to Russell, how ood is this inference? EX lain your answer. g P . Section D. l. \W hat is soft determinism? Is it defendable? 2. Why is it difficult to find a place for ‘selves’ within a scientific conception of the world? 3. “In its quest for certainty, philosophy uncovers more and more uncertainty”. ls this the ease, and if so what benefits are to be gained from studying philosophy? 4. Suppose that, walking through the forest one day, you came across a large, smooth, transparent ball. \Would this be an occasion for you to appeal to the principle of sufficient reason? Could that principle be used to argue for the existence of God? How? ...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page1 / 2

PHIL_200_december2004 - final - FACULTY OF ARTS FINAL...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online