PHIL_200_december2006 - final

PHIL_200_december2006 - final - FACULTY OF ARTS FINAL...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Background image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: FACULTY OF ARTS FINAL EXAMINATION PHIL 200A INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY I Examiner: Prof. Storrs McCall Associate Examiner: Prof. Michael Hallett Date: Friday, December 8, 2006. Time: 2pm — 5pm Instructions: Answer ONE question from EACH section. Answer in EXAM BOOK. No notes or texts are permitted in the examination. Only translation dictionaries are allowed. You may keep the exam. - ‘ This exam comprises 2 pages, including the cover page. This exam is printed double-sided. Philosophy 200A: Final Exam. Section A. 1. It makes sense to speak of destroying an individual purple thing, or even all purple things, but not of destroying the form of purple-ness. Comment. 2. Socrates maintains that the life of a philosopher is essentially one long preparation for death. Why does he believe this to be the case? 3. “No one who truly knows the good will voluntarily do evil.” Is this true? How does Socrates argue for it? Section B. 4. Why does Descartes present two different arguments for God’s existence in Meditations 3 and 5? How do the two arguments differ? 5. Russell criticizes Descartes for concluding more than is warranted in saying “I think, therefore I am.” Compare Descartes’ and Russell’s Views on this question. 6. Cartesian dualism asserts that there exist two distinct types of substance. Describe the differences between the two. Would God’s substance constitute a third distinct type? If so, why? Section C. 7. Alfred North Whitehead and Bertrand Russell co-authored Princz‘pia Mathematica. Could it be said that Russell was acquainted with Whitehead? 8. What kind of universal does Russell use in attempting to prove that at least one of Plato’s Ideas exists? Is he successful? 9. A memory image exists in the present, but what we remember is past. How does Russell claim to solve the problem of memory? Section D 10. State the strengths and weaknesses of mind-body materialism. 11. “Time, like an ever—rolling stream Bears all its sons away.” Is time like a stream? 12. If stones on a hillside had a purely naturalistic origin (e.g. glacial action), they could not tell us we were now entering Wales. If our eyes had a purely naturalistic origin (e.g. random mutations plus natural selection) they could not tell us an invigilator was walking down the next row. Can we conclude that the Darwinian explanation of our eyes’ origin is mistaken? ...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/02/2012 for the course PHIL 200 taught by Professor Mccall during the Spring '08 term at McGill.

Page1 / 2

PHIL_200_december2006 - final - FACULTY OF ARTS FINAL...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online