Key_Assignment 2-spr2012

Key_Assignment 2-spr2012 - MGMT 405: Six Sigma Quality...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: MGMT 405: Six Sigma Quality Management Assignment 2 Solution 1. (a) Analysis of Variance Table for Service Source DF SS MS F P Teller 2 2.844 1.422 10.52 0.000 Error 33 4.459 0.135 Total 35 7.303 (b) Approximate .05,2,33 F by .05,2,30 3.32. F = Since F = 10.52 > 3.32, Reject Ho. Yes, at alpha = 5%, there is a significant difference in the mean service times for the three tellers. (c) Tukey's pairwise comparisons Family error rate = 0.0500 Individual error rate = 0.0196 Critical value = 3.47 Intervals for (column level mean) - (row level mean) 1 2 2 -0.9766-0.2401 3 -0.9516 -0.3432-0.2151 0.3932 From above computer output: For testing 1 2 H :μ =μ , the confidence interval (CI) of 1 2 μ μ- is (-0.9766, -0.2401). Since “0” is outside this CI, reject Ho . Also we see that 1 2 μ μ < . For testing 2 3 H :μ =μ , the confidence interval (CI) of 2 3 μ μ- is (-0.3432, 0.3932). Since “0” is inside this CI, do not reject Ho . Above two tests suggest that Teller 1 is the best since his/her mean service time is the smallest. However, since Teller 1 serves only drive-in customers, it may be justified to repeat the analysis based on Teller 1’s service times after asking him/her to serve walk-in customers. 2. (a) Analysis of Variance for Time, using Adjusted SS for Tests Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F P System 2 103.333 103.333 51.667 56.36 0.000 Operator 4 64.667 64.667 16.167 17.64 0.000 Error 8 7.333 7.333 0.917 Total 14 175.333 (b) .05,2,8 4.46. F = Since F = 56.36 > 4.46, reject Ho. Yes, at alpha = 5%, there is a significant difference in the mean training times for the three systems. (c) Tukey 95.0% Simultaneous Confidence Intervals Response Variable Time All Pairwise Comparisons among Levels of System System = A subtracted from: System Lower Center Upper ----------+---------+---------+------ B -2.730 -1.000 0.7298 (-----*----) C 3.270 5.000 6.7298 (-----*----) ----------+---------+---------+------ 0.0 3.0 6.0 System = B subtracted from: System Lower Center Upper ----------+---------+---------+------ C 4.270 6.000 7.730 (-----*-----) ----------+---------+---------+------ 0.0 3.0 6.0 From above output: For testing : , A B H μ μ = the confidence interval (CI) for...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/04/2012 for the course MGMT 405 taught by Professor Staff during the Spring '08 term at Purdue.

Page1 / 7

Key_Assignment 2-spr2012 - MGMT 405: Six Sigma Quality...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online