This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: TS = 2048 . If a regulation or tax is created to address the external cost, it would seem as though society would be worse off - equilibrium P is higher, and Q is lower, than before the regulation was imposed. But. ...we haven't accounted for the social costs and benefits of the rule. Let's look at the 'lost' area with the regulation in place. ....From the original supply (MPC) function, at Q = 128, P is equal to 10 + .075 (128) = 10 + 9.6 = 19.6. So the area of the 'loss' triangle is (26-19.6)* (32) * .5 = 102.4, which appears to be deadweight loss - but what were the social costs at the initial level of output (Q = 160)? Using the MSC function: 10 + .125*(160) = 10 + 20 = 30 = MSC. ..and (30-22) (32)*.5 = 128. So the total gains to society = 128 + 102.4 = 230.4, and the costs of achieving this improvement are 102.4, so net improvement in efficiency = 128....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 04/05/2012 for the course ECP 3302 taught by Professor Staff during the Fall '11 term at Florida State College.
- Fall '11