2-8-11 - 2-8-11MEATRIXSinger’s Utilitarian ArgumentoWhat...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 2-8-11MEATRIXSinger’s Utilitarian ArgumentoWhat is morally relevant?oWhat makes someone/something worthy of moral considerationSufferingoThe capacity for suffering and enjoymentoBentham: “the question is not, Can they reason? Nor can they talk? But, can they suffer?”Equal ConsiderationoEquality: everyone’s interests deserve equal considerationoA prescription of how we should treat beingsoBentham: “each to count for one and none for more than one.”oSidgwick: “The good of any one individual is of no more importance, from the point of view (if I may say so) of the Universe, than the good of any other.”Racism, Sexism, SpeciesismoRefusal to give equal consideration on the basis of:oRacism – raceoSexism – sexoSpeciesism – speciesoIn each case, interests of one group are favored unfairly over those of othersUtilitarian BasisoCapacity for suffering and/or enjoyment is a prerequisite for having interestsoCapacity for suffering and/or enjoyment gives us interestsoWe must take into account all interests equally...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/05/2012 for the course PHI 2100 taught by Professor Mikepatterson during the Spring '12 term at FSU.

Page1 / 2

2-8-11 - 2-8-11MEATRIXSinger’s Utilitarian ArgumentoWhat...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online