4-14-11 - 4-14-11Washington vs. Glucksberg (1997)-Is a ban...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 4-14-11Washington vs. Glucksberg (1997)-Is a ban on causing or aiding a suicide unconstitutional? (Does the ban violate the 14thamendment?)-No. The court maintains that we do not have a right to dieBanning Suicide in WA-WA has had some form of a ban against suicide since 1854-Current law states: A person is guilty of promoting a suicide attempt when he knowingly causes or aids another person to attempt suicide-Promoting a suicide is a felony in WA-Withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment is not suicide.Why dont we have a right to die?-In almost every state, in almost every democracy, it is a crime to assist a suicide-Long-standing expressions of commitment to protect and preserve human life-For 700 years, our common-law tradition has criminalized suicide and assisted suicide.-The earliest law explicitly banning assisted suicide was enacted in New York in 1828-New York specified later (by 1865) that providing someone with any deadly weapon or drug, knowing that the person intends to use it to take her own life, is...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/05/2012 for the course PHI 2100 taught by Professor Mikepatterson during the Spring '12 term at FSU.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online