Is the area for which the application is being made

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: feels that the determination is not in the ‘state’s interest’, the state Mining Minister can override it. 861 • Is the Registrar satisfied that at least one member of the native title claim group currently has or previously had a traditional physical connection with the land or waters covered by the application (s 190B(7))? • Is the area for which the application is being made subject to a previously approved native title determination, or a previous exclusive or non-exclusive possession act that because of s 61A should not have been made (s 190B(8))? • Has there been an extinguishment of claimed native title by the Crown, a state or territory where ownership relates to minerals, petroleum or gas, to waters in an offshore place or otherwise extinguished (s 190B(9)(a)–(c))? • Is the Registrar satisfied that the application contains all the details and information required by ss 61 and 62 (s 190C(2))? • Does the current claim overlap with any previous claims in whole or in part that have already passed the registration test (s 190C(3))? • Has the application been certified by the relevant representative body or bodies, or is the applicant a member of the native title claim group and authorised to make the application (s 190C(4))? Once the conditions of the registration test have been satisfied, a claiman...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 04/23/2012.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online