Native title and land rights native title and land

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: s, rivers, creeks and swamps, where those waters are not privately owned. For example, the High Court confirmed in Commonwealth v Yarmirr [2001] HCA 56 (the ‘Croker Island Case’) that native title holders could have limited rights over offshore waters. Native title and land rights Native title and land rights are not one and the same thing. Land rights are grants created by government, while native title is a pre-existing right derived from traditional law and customs that evolved in Australia long before white settlement occurred. Native title isn’t a grant or right created by governments. Extinguishment of native title The High Court held in Fejo v Northern Territory of Australia (1998) 195 CLR 96 that once land had been subject to freehold title, native title rights were then lost and could not be ‘revived’ if the land was subsequently taken back by the Crown. The High Court also indicated that legislative intention wasn’t essential to effect an extinguishment of native title. If the act of the executive—for example, by way of a Crown grant—exhibited a clear and plain intention to extinguish native title, that would suffice. Rights of pastor...
View Full Document

This document was uploaded on 04/23/2012.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online