BI DISCUSSION 1 AND 2 WK 1.doc - Discussion 1 1. The first...

This preview shows page 1 - 2 out of 2 pages.

Discussion 11. The first paragraph I believe it constitutes plagiarism because it only states “according to our book” and in order for the reader to verify such information the name of the book, the author, the chapter and/or page number the information was retrieved from should have been provided and cited. The second paragraph does have quotation marks and although it is cited, Wikipedia is not a reputable and credible source. The third paragraph does not have quotation marks and the information comes from Wikipedia and the citation is not completed therefore, the reader is not able to look up such information. The last paragraph it is cited correctly but it doesn’t have quotation so it constitutes plagiarism as well.2. The information above was not used correctly because some information was retrieved from a non reputable source. Wikipedia is one source that should be avoid using and if a textbook is used, citation must be correctly done in order to verify the information given. 3. “Covalent bonds form when two nonmetallic atoms have the same or similar electronegativity values. If two identical nonmetals(Links to an external site.)bond together, they will form a pure covalent bond. When two dissimilar nonmetals form

Upload your study docs or become a

Course Hero member to access this document

End of preview. Want to read all 2 pages?

Upload your study docs or become a

Course Hero member to access this document

Term
Fall
Professor
N/A
Tags
Atom, Electron, Electric charge, Chemical bond

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture