3. Prudential vs. Panis.pdf - 3 G.R No L-50008 PRUDENTIAL BANK petitioner vs HONORABLE DOMINGO D PANIS Presiding Judge of Branch III Court of First

3. Prudential vs. Panis.pdf - 3 G.R No L-50008 PRUDENTIAL...

This preview shows page 1 out of 1 page.

3. G.R. No. L-50008 August 31, 1987 PRUDENTIAL BANK, petitioner, vs. HONORABLE DOMINGO D. PANIS, Presiding Judge of Branch III, Court of First Instance of Zambales and Olongapo City; FERNANDO MAGCALE & TEODULA BALUYUT-MAGCALE, respondents. FACTS: Spouses Magcale secured a loan from Prudential Bank. To secure payment, they executed a real estate mortgage over a residential building. The mortgage included also the right to occupy the lot and the information about the sales patent applied for by the spouses for the lot to which the building stood. After securing the first loan, the spouses secured another from the same bank. To secure payment, another real estate mortgage was executed over the same properties. The Secretary of Agriculture then issued a Miscellaneous Sales Patent over the land which was later on mortgaged to the bank. The spouses then failed to pay for the loan and the REM was extrajudicially foreclosed and sold in public auction despite opposition from the spouses. The respondent court held that the REM was null and void.
Image of page 1

You've reached the end of your free preview.

Want to read the whole page?

  • Summer '17
  • Dean Almirante
  • Prudential Bank

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture