3d dca review denied 513 so 2d 1062 fla 1987

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 3d DCA), review denied, 513 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. 1987). Fundamental error occurs if the error extinguishes "a party's [**4] right to a fair trial," Moore v. Taylor Concrete & Supply Co., Inc., 553 So. 2d 787, 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), or if the argument "was so prejudicial as to be incapable of cure by rebuke or retraction." Borden, Inc. v. Young, 479 So. 2d 850, 851 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), review denied, 488 So. 2d 832 (Fla. 1986). In the instant case, we find that the cumulative effect of these improper and prejudicial comments rises to the level of fundamental error, Pippin v. Latosynski, 622 So. 2d 566 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Murphy v. Murphy, 622 So. 2d 99 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Schubert v. Allstate Ins. Co., 603 So. 2d 554 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. dismissed, 606 So. 2d 1164 (Fla. 1992), and that a new trial is warranted. As to the cross-appeal, we find that the trial court correctly denied Dade County's motion for directed verdict. In light of Kenneth Harms' expert testimony, there was sufficient evidence upon which the jury could find for the plaintiffs, See Ogden v. State, Dep't of Transp., 601 So. 2d 1300 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Balart v. Michel's Kartway, Inc., 364 So. 2d 90 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), and we, therefore, affirm the denial of Dade County's motion for directed verdict. [**5] Affirmed, in part, and reversed and remanded, in part. 6 Case # 2 STRAHAN v. GAULDIN ARTHUR P. STRAHAN, etc., et al., Appellants, v. DEWEY L. GAULDIN, Appellee. Case No. 5D99-230 & 5D99-874 COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, FIFTH DISTRICT 756 So. 2d 158; 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2956; 25 Fla. Law W. D 666 March 17, 2000, Opinion Filed SUBSEQUENT HISTORY: [**1] Rehearing Denied May 2, 2000. Released for Publication May 19, 2000. PRIOR HISTORY: Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Jere E. Lober, Judge. DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED. COUNSEL: Richard A. Sherman and Rosemary B. Wilder of Richard A. Sherman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, and Scott Turner of Jack, Wyat...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 09/30/2012 for the course ENC 102 taught by Professor Deria during the Spring '08 term at FIU.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online