CourtCases2010

Affirmed defendant did not have a reasonable

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: consider the defendant's interception of these communications to be a substantial and highly offensive invasion of his privacy. Again, we note that by intercepting such communications, the company is not, as in the case of urinalysis or personal property searches, requiring the employee to disclose any personal information about himself or invading the employee's person or personal effects. Moreover, the company's interest in preventing inappropriate and unprofessional comments or even illegal activity over its e-mail system outweighs any privacy interest the employee may have in those comments. In sum, we find that the defendant's actions did not tortiously invade the plaintiff's privacy and, therefore, did not violate public policy. As a result, the motion to dismiss is granted. 77 Case # 11 USA vs. ZEIGLER United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey Brian ZIEGLER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 05-30177. Argued and Submitted March 6, 2006. Filed Aug. 8, 2006. Background: Defendant was convicted in the United States District Court for the District of Montana, Richard F. Cebull, J., of receipt of obscene material, and he appealed. Holding: The Court of Appeals, O'Scannlain, Circuit Judge, held that defendant did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in his workplace computer. Affirmed. Defendant did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in his workplace computer, and thus, he did not have standing to challenge search of computer's hard drive under Fourth Amendment; although defendant had to use individual log-in to access workplace computer, personnel from employer's internet technology (IT) department had complete administrative access to all employees' computers, employer prohibited private use of computers by employees, employer had installed a firewall that monitored employees' internet traffic on workplace computers, IT department reviewed log created by firewall on a regular basis, and employees were apprised in training and...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online