Mcalindins statement is sufficient to raise a genuine

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ant here - engaging in sexual relations, sleeping, and interacting with others - meet this requirement for the purposes of surviving disposition on summary judgment. The district court gave no reason why these activities are not significant in the life of the average person, like walking, [**14] speaking, and learning. 1. Sexual Relations In Bragdon, which was decided after the district court granted summary judgment, the Supreme Court strongly implied that engaging in sexual relations, like reproduction, is a major life activity. See 118 S. Ct. at 2205 (holding that "reproduction falls well within the phrase 'major life activity' because "reproduction and the sexual dynamics surrounding it are central to the life process itself"). Other courts have reached the same conclusion. See, e.g., Anderson v. Gus Mayer Boston Store, 924 F. Supp. 763, 775 n.24 (E.D. Tex. 1996) (AIDS impairs the major life activity of "engaging in intimate sexual relationships"); Doe v. District of Columbia, 796 F. Supp. 559, 568 (D. D.C. 1992) ("sexual contact" is a major life activity under the Rehabilitation Act, the ADA's precursor). We conclude that engaging in sexual relations, just like procreation, is a major life activity. The number of people who engage in sexual relations is plainly larger than the number who choose to have children. Moreover, according to the reasoning employed by the Fifth Circuit with respect to working [**15] as a major life activity, sexuality is important in how "we define ourselves and how we are perceived by others" and is a fundamental part of how we bond in intimate relationships. EEOC v. R.J. Gallagher Co., 181 F.3d 645, 1999 WL 499571, at *7 (5th Cir. 1999). n7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Footnotes- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - n7 In Runnebaum v. Nationsbank, 123 F.3d 156, 170-71 (4th Cir. 1997) (en banc), the Fourth Circuit expressed doubt over whether engaging in sexual relations is a major life activi...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 09/30/2012 for the course ENC 102 taught by Professor Deria during the Spring '08 term at FIU.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online