That same day zihalas supervisors completed a

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ther Henderson, or any other women at GE IMV, suffered an adverse employment action because of her gender. D.Conn.,2006. Henderson v. General Elec. Co. --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2006 WL 3543175 (D.Conn.) Motions, Pleadings and Filings (Back to top) • 2005 WL 3236770 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Nov. 1, 2005)Original Image of this Document (PDF) • 2005 WL 2892065 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Sep. 26, 2005)Original Image of this Document (PDF) • 3:03cv02176 (Docket) (Dec. 17, 2003) END OF DOCUMENT 180 181 ADA Discrimination 182 Case # 20 ZIHALA v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH ELIZABETH ANN ZIHALA, Plaintiff, v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH, Defendant. No. 95 C 2129 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2445 February 22, 1999, Decided February 26, 1999, Docketed DISPOSITION: [*1] Defendant's motion for summary judgment granted. COUNSEL: For ELIZABETH ANN ZIHALA, plaintiff: William F. Spielberger, William F. Spielberger & Associates, P.C., Chicago, IL. For ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH, defendant: Paula J. Giroux, Joel Cabrera, Illinois Attorney General's Office, Chicago, IL. For JOHN LUMPKIN, defendant: Joel Cabrera, Illinois Attorney General's Office, Chicago, IL. JUDGES: Wayne R. Andersen, United States District Judge. OPINIONBY: Wayne R. Andersen OPINION: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff, Elizabeth Zihala, filed this action against her former employer, the Illinois Department of Public Health, alleging that the Department discriminated against her in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., by denying her a reasonable accommodation and by discharging her because she suffered from bipolar disorder. The Department moves for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. For the following reasons, the motion for summary judgment is granted. BACKGROUND The fol...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 09/30/2012 for the course ENC 102 taught by Professor Deria during the Spring '08 term at FIU.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online