The district court committed reversible error in

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ts of intermediate level management officials were not indicative of discrimination when the ultimate decision to discharge [*13] is made by an upper-level official); Wilson v. Stroh Cos., Inc., 952 F.2d 942, 94546 (6th Cir. 1992) (holding that racial animus by plant manager could not be imputed to 102 upper-level manager who made decision to terminate absent proof of a connection); cf. Talley v. Bravo Pitino Restaurant, Ltd., 61 F.3d 1241, 1249 (6 th Cir. 1995) (holding that repeated racial slurs by two owners constituted direct evidence that the plaintiff's termination might have been racially motivated). Further, the stray comments were made long before Smith's termination. See Phelps v. Yale Security, Inc., 986 F.2d 1020, 1025-26 (6th Cir. 1990); see also Russell v. AcmeEvans Co., 51 F.3d 64, 68 (7th Cir. 1995) (holding that threat to shove a shotgun up the plaintiff's "black ass" made fifteen years prior to termination decision was "too tenuously related to the alleged discriminatory action by supervisors many years later" to create an inference of discrimination). Thus, the stray remarks were not relevant. See Ercegovich v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 154 F.3d 344, 354 (6th Cir. 1998) ("In assessing the [*14] relevancy of a discriminatory remark, we look first at the identity of the speaker. An isolated discriminatory remark made by one with no managerial authority over the challenged personnel decisions is not considered indicative of . . . discrimination."); cf. Robinson v. Runyon, 149 F.3d 507, 512 (6th Cir. 1998) (holding that evidence showing that coemployees circulated a fake employment application incorporating racial stereotypes was relevant where the plaintiff showed that upper management knew of the application, but did not condemn it). Nor can we say that the error was harmless. The derogatory and graphic racial comments in this case are the "smoking gun" type evidence that added an "emotional element" as a basis f...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 09/30/2012 for the course ENC 102 taught by Professor Deria during the Spring '08 term at FIU.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online