corporate-finance

# Alternatively we could have borrowed 1 of firm ls

This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: must be equal to the value of Firm L. In summary, firm value is independent of the debt policy. Consider an alternative investment strategy where we consider investing only in 1 percent of L’s equity. Alternatively, we could have borrowed 1% of firm L's debt, DL, in the bank and purchased 1 percent of Firm U. The investment in 1% of Firm L's equity yields 1% of the profits after interest payment in return. Similarly, borrowing 1% of L's debt requires payment of 1% of the interest, whereas investing in 1% of U yields 1% of the profits. Investment Return 1% of Firm L's equity 1% · EL = 1% · (VL - DL) 1% · (Profits - Interest) Borrow 1% of Firm L's debt and purchase 1% of Firm U - Borrow 1% of L's debt - 1% of U's equity -1% · DL 1% · EU = 1% · VU -1% · Interest 1% · Profits = 1% (VU - DL) = 1% · (Profits - Interest) It follows from the comparison that both investments return 1% of the profits after interest payment. Again, as the profits are assumed to be identical, the value of the two investments must be equal. Setting the value of investing 1% in Firm L's equity equal to the value of borrowing 1% of L's debt and investing in 1% of U's equity, yields that the value of Firm U and L must be equal - 1% · (VL - DL) = 1% · (VU - DL) VL = VU The insight from the two examples above can be summarized by MM's proposition I: Miller and Modigliani's Proposition I...
View Full Document

## This note was uploaded on 10/26/2012 for the course 19 19 taught by Professor - during the Spring '12 term at Sunway University College.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online