Similarly cognitive theorist aaron beck argued that

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: ople who make these assumptions are faced with a stressful event, such as an exam or a blind date, they are likely to interpret it as dangerous, to overreact, and to experience fear. As they apply the assumptions to more and more events, they may begin to develop generalized anxiety disorder (Warren, 1997). Similarly, cognitive theorist Aaron Beck argued that people with generalized anxiety disorder constantly hold silent assumptions (for example, “A situation or a person is unsafe until proven to be safe” or “It is always best to assume the worst”) that imply they are in imminent danger (Beck & Weishaar, 2008; Beck & Emery, 1985). Since the time of Ellis’s and Beck’s initial proposals, researchers have repeatedly found that people with generalized anxiety disorder do indeed hold maladaptive assumptions, particularly about dangerousness (Riskind & Williams, 2005). New Wave Cognitive Explanations In recent years, three new explanations for generalized anxiety disorder, sometimes called the new wave cognitive explanations, have emerged (Ritter et al., 2010). Each of them builds on the work of Ellis and Beck and their emphasis on danger. The metacognitive theory, developed by the researcher Adrian Wells (2009, 2005), suggests that people with generalized anxiety disorder implicitly hold both positive and negative beliefs about worrying. On the positive side, they believe that worrying is a useful way of appraising and coping with threats in life. And so they look for and examine all possible signs of danger—that is, they worry constantly. At the same time, Wells argues, individuals with generalized anxiety disorder also hold negative beliefs about worrying, and these negative attitudes are the ones that open the door to the disorder. Because society teaches them that worrying is a bad thing, the individuals come to believe that their repeated worrying is in fact harmful (mentally and physically) and uncontrollable. Now they further worry about the fact that they always seem to be worrying (so-called metaworries) (see Table 4-3). The net effect of all this worrying: generalized anxiety disorder. This explanation has received considerable research support. Studies indicate, for example, that individuals who generally hold both positive and negative beliefs about worrying are particularly prone to developing generalized anxiety disorder (Khawaja & 12/10/09 11:16:06 AM Anxiety Disorders :// 101 A CLOSER LOOK Fears, Shmears: The Odds Are Usually on Our Side P A city resident will be a victim of a violent crime . . . 1 in 60 A suburbanite will be a victim of a violent crime . . . 1 in 1,000 A small-town resident will be a victim of a violent crime . . . 1 in 2,000 A child will suffer a high chair injury this year . . . 1 in 6,000 Build with care The chance of a construction worker being injured at work during the year is 1 in 27. Jim Harrison/Stock Boston eople with anxiety disorders have many unreasonable fears, but millions of other people, too, worry about disaster...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 01/07/2013 for the course PSY 270 taught by Professor Hall during the Spring '05 term at University of Phoenix.

Ask a homework question - tutors are online