ResponsePaper8 - HIST 213 Response Paper Brent Fiorito...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
HIST 213 Brent Fiorito Response Paper 2/18/08 Studying Slave Culture In Sterling Stuckey’s reflections on the scholarship of African origins and influence in American slavery he points out the many flaws of scholars when dealing with slave culture. He starts by mentioning how the cultural clash in America between Africans and Europeans which was caused by slavery is consistently avoided by scholars. Then he picks apart the unfortunate scholars who have attempted to cover this topic. He points out how most of them have failed miserably when dealing with slave culture by using inconsistent or no data or by just making things up as in the case of Ira Berlin. I believe Stuckey’s reflections and criticisms on the works of others clearly shows the lack of effort by scholars to research and understand African culture in North America and its impact on European and American cultures that enslaved them. Stuckey begins by addressing the Mintz-Prince study which was supposedly “a study of black culture in North America.” It turned out not to be that at all but more importantly it raises the argument that blacks arrived in America with no culture. They also argue that “Africans became African-American before arriving in American as slaves, presumably at precisely the
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This essay was uploaded on 04/07/2008 for the course HIST 213 taught by Professor Miller during the Spring '08 term at UVA.

Page1 / 3

ResponsePaper8 - HIST 213 Response Paper Brent Fiorito...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online